Would you be fine with a looksmatch society?
#21
Yes, of course. This is how it used to be, and this is how it should be.
Reply
#22
This is ideally how society would function but female hypergamy makes it impossible.
Reply
#23
(Yesterday, 03:30 AM)RopeForSluts Wrote: THIS is how society was set up for thousands of years and it is what brought us civilization and the very idea of an organized society. We NEED to go back or we're doomed.

Lmao slut holocaust. I could see that Schindlers List: sluts making pots and pans. Some slut trying to Tinder on her phone instead of making hinges gets hauled outside by SS Incel Captain.
Reply
#24
Definitely. If anything, I'm more attracted to "homely" and "nerdy" looking girls than models. Too bad they'd rather pine for someone attractive til the end of time than so much as glance in my direction.
Reply
#25
I know that scale in OP isn't perfect and was likely made by a single person with their own taste, and I'm not gay or attracted to men in any way, but I feel like the dudes at 5 or 6 are better looking than the girls at 5 or 6 that they are paired up with.

This tells me that my standards for women are probably too high to be okay with absolute looksmatch. Fuck.

(Yesterday, 05:26 AM)sepelion Wrote:
(Yesterday, 03:30 AM)RopeForSluts Wrote: THIS is how society was set up for thousands of years and it is what brought us civilization and the very idea of an organized society. We NEED to go back or we're doomed.

Lmao slut holocaust. I could see that Schindlers List: sluts making pots and pans. Some slut trying to Tinder on her phone instead of making hinges gets hauled outside by SS Incel Captain.

LOL.
Deteriorating as I studycel my life away
Reply
#26
(Yesterday, 03:13 AM)Gunnage Wrote:
(Yesterday, 02:25 AM)universallyabhorred Wrote: I would find this acceptable only if the female was pure and chaste, married to me, was unable to divorce me and adultery by her was punishable by death.
She would make your life a living hell of constant nagging and bitchery
I'd beat her to keep her frightened and prevent her from talking back to me.
Reply
#27
No, i only want stacy/stacies who are 8/10 or over.

My standards are high, but i will keep pursuing until i get them.
Reply
#28
Socialstatusmatching is better
Reply
#29
it would be ideal but I would not want to stick with ugly fat deformed women
Reply
#30
If you say no you are not an incel. A truecel would settle for anything to lose incel status. I understand if you wouldn't want to end up with a fat girl, but being fat is a choice and it'd be your job to make her lose weight in the case of a looksmatch society.
If we can’t solve our problems we must DESTROY our problems... One day incels will realise their true strength and numbers and will overthrow this oppressive feminist system. Start envisioning a world where WOMEN FEAR YOU.
Reply
#31
It's not about society. It's about nature. You can't force looksmatching to people when it's nature itself that is fundamentally flawed. The human race needs to be recontructed from scratch imho. The humans of today are irrational garbage.
True romance, being desired and being the object of women's sexual fantasies, is the most precious thing, since women's sexuality revolves around making their loved one cum and pleasuring him. No need to prove yourself worth of her love, no need for money or status just love and passionate sex.
Reply
#32
my nickname is related to this thread.
Reply
#33
(Yesterday, 05:26 AM)blickpall Wrote: I know that scale in OP isn't perfect and was likely made by a single person with their own taste, and I'm not gay or attracted to men in any way, but I feel like the dudes at 5 or 6 are better looking than the girls at 5 or 6 that they are paired up with.

This tells me that my standards for women are probably too high to be okay with absolute looksmatch. Fuck.

Exactly what I thought. The 5th/6th picture list is not looks matched at all.
Reply
#34
Of course
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)